CubeShackles
Menu

Institutions

Infrastructure designed to enter existing financial environments.

CubeShackles engages institutions through a controlled, evidence-based deployment sequence. No institution, pilot, or partnership is represented on this site unless it has been authorized for public disclosure by that institution.

Who this is for

Banks and financial institutions

Core banking and payment operations that need reconciliation and auditability across branches or channels with inconsistent connectivity, without replacing an existing core.

Payment infrastructure operators

Switches, processors, and rails that need deterministic reconciliation and replay protection across distributed, sometimes degraded-connectivity endpoints.

Public-sector and regulatory stakeholders

Agencies evaluating auditable financial infrastructure for oversight, reporting, or public-system reliability — engaged as stakeholders in the architecture, not as vendors of it.

Capital-market institutions

Institutions requiring tamper-evident audit trails and canonical state reconstruction for instruments and settlement processes with strict finality requirements.

Enterprise operators

Fintech and enterprise platforms building on financial rails that need a reconciliation and integrity layer under their own application logic.

Deployment lifecycle

Every institutional engagement moves through the same four stages, in order. No stage is skipped, and no stage implies the next is guaranteed.

  1. 01

    Diligence

    Institution reviews the architecture, threat model, and integration boundary. No data or systems are connected at this stage.

  2. 02

    Sandbox

    Integration is exercised against a non-production environment with synthetic data, against the same Institutional API used in production.

  3. 03

    Pilot

    A scoped, time-bounded evaluation with a defined data boundary, agreed with the institution before any live transaction flows through the integration.

  4. 04

    Production

    Full deployment against the institution’s live systems, under the security and compliance posture established during pilot.

Integration responsibilities

Institution

  • Owns and operates its core system of record
  • Defines the data boundary exposed to the Institutional API
  • Retains authority over reconciliation-conflict resolution for its own transactions
  • Runs its own compliance and regulatory reporting obligations

CubeShackles

  • Operates the reconciliation and audit layer
  • Maintains the Institutional API and its documented integration contract
  • Provides the audit trail and observability signals for the integration
  • Discloses security issues and architecture changes affecting the integration

Security and compliance posture

The Institutional API is scoped to the minimum data boundary required for reconciliation — it is not designed as a general-purpose data pipe into an institution's core systems. Every access to the integration is recorded in the audit layer described on the Infrastructure page. Security issues affecting an integration are disclosed through the process on the Contact page. Regulatory posture is jurisdiction-specific and evaluated case by case with each institution and applicable authority — no blanket regulatory approval is claimed for any jurisdiction.

Discuss an institutional deployment

Institutional and pilot inquiries route through a dedicated contact funnel, separate from general and press inquiries.

Go to contact